In light of recent protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), marketing professor Scott Galloway has proposed a boycott of major tech companies as a means to influence immigration policies under the Trump administration. Galloway argues that a targeted approach, focusing on unsubscribing from services provided by companies like Amazon and Microsoft, could have a more significant impact than traditional protests.
The Rationale Behind the Boycott
Galloway believes that economic boycotts can effectively pressure the administration to reconsider its policies. He points out that many small businesses struggle to participate in general strikes, which often place a heavy burden on them. Instead, he suggests that a month-long boycott of Big Tech could send a strong message to those in power.
Recent Developments
As tensions rise over immigration policies, Galloway’s call for action comes amid ongoing protests against ICE’s tactics. He emphasizes that while protests are important, economic withdrawals can create more substantial changes in policy.
For further details on Galloway’s boycott initiative and its potential implications, visit Business Insider.